TDSRG
Introduction
UK Command and Control
TDL Operations Overview
Tactical Data Links

Link 1

Link 14

Link 11 (TADIL A)

CLEW

SLEW

Link 11B (TADIL B)

JTIDS IJMS

MIDS / JTIDS Link 16 (TADIL J)

MIDS / JTIDS Network Participation Groups

Qt / Qp Table

CPD Table

Link 22

VMF

Other Links

Air Force Applications Program Development (AFAPD)

ATDL-1

Air Command and Control System (ACCS)  Wide Common Information Standard (AWCIES)

CDL / TCDL / HIDL

CEC / Joint Composite Tracking Network (JCTN)

Fighter Data Link (FDL) (USAF)

FORMETS / Message Text Format (MTF)

Link 4 (TADIL C)

Joint Range Extension (JRE)

Surveillance and Control Data Link (SCDL)

STDL Link 16 / S-TADIL J

TACFIRE

Integrated Broadcast System (IBS)

TDL Summary

TDL Platform Capability Summary

UK Tactical Data Systems
Allied Tactical Data Systems
CIS Operations Overview
CIS and Communications
Message Standards - Appendix A
Reference Publications - Appendix B
Glossary and Acronyms - Appendix C
UK Tactical Data Systems Reference Guide
Tactical Data Links

Link 1

 

Designed in the late 1950s, Link 1 has low capacity and is usually insecure.  It is used between ground-based Air Surveillance and Control system (ASACS) units, but it may also be used by ground-based mobile units to connect into a static C2 system.  Link 1 units are allocated areas of responsibility, termed Track Production Areas (TPA), whose boundaries are overlapped by Track Continuity Areas (TCA).  Tracks within the TCAs are exchanged automatically between the adjacent units, but wider area data exchange may also be carried out within operator-defined Area of Operational Interest (AOI)s.

 

Purpose

Exchange air tracks and EW strobes in near real-time.

Attributes

Simplex or duplex, Point to point

Not normally encrypted.

Data rate 600 or 1200 bps (but may be operated at any multiple of 600 bps if agreed to by the participants).

Format

‘S’ series messages

128 bits (30 bits overhead, 2 x 49 bit paired data messages).

Track No

15 bit NATO Track Numbers (NTN) (2-letter alpha bi-graph, 3 digit octal number. The bi-graph indicates the originating unit and not the current tracking unit).

Medium

Landline (cable, microwave, SATCOM) or multi-channel radio. Synchronous Differential Frequency Shift Keying (DFSK) waveform.

Strengths

Widely used throughout Europe.

ECM-resistant, as is inherent in a buried cable or microwave link.

Limitations

No free text capability.

Track management is basic (e.g. change Identification (ID)).

No C2 capability (but target engagement and fighter allocation status can be handled).

Slow - track telling is prioritised by category and tracks with low priority (typically friendlies) can be minutes out of date.

Standards

STANAG 5501

STANAG 5601

SOPs

ADatP-31


Link 14

Link 14 is a nonreal-time radio teletype link that allows TDS equipped units to provide a broadcast to other units without TDSs.  The HCI is either a simple list on a teleprinter or a pictorial presentation on an Autoplot Visual Display Unit (VDU).  Link 14 was designed to pass track data, but the link is very slow and so it is now used primarily to provide a (High Interest Track Broadcast (HITB) to supplement real-time data links and voice reports.  Although it was discontinued as a NATO TDL from 2000, it is still likely to remain in service for several years.  Some UK platforms (E3D and T42/CVS) remain fitted but it does not form part of the current UK TDL operational TDL capability

 

Purpose

Exchange of EW data, air, surface and subsurface tracks, and points and free text.

Attributes

Broadcast.

Encrypted (BID 850).

Data Rate 75 bps.

Format

Man-readable character strings.

Track No

12 bit Data Link Reference Number (DLRN) (4 digit octal number).

Medium

HF, UHF or SHF satellite Radio Teletype (RATT).

Uses Frequency Shift Keying (FSK) with a 2-tone Keyer.

 

Strengths

The design of the Teletype transmission allows reception over very long-ranges.

It is more resistant to jamming on HF than is Link 11.

Limitations

Although there is a standard NATO format for Link 14, almost nobody uses it and numerous national formats have been developed, not all of which are interoperable.  Units must therefore agree on a version before use.

The data rate is very slow and tracks may only be updated approximately every 6 mins.

Standards

STANAG 5514

SOPs

ADatP-14


Link 11 (TADIL A)

Link 11, sometimes called Link 11A (Tactical Digital Information Link A (TADIL A)) to differentiate it from Link 11B, is based on 1960’s technology and is a relatively slow link.  It is secure, but not ECM-resistant, and is used widely to exchange digital information among airborne, land-based, and shipboard systems.  It is normally operated in a roll call, or netted polling, mode under the control of a Data Net Control Station (DNCS).  The DNCS initiates the roll call by addressing and transmitting an interrogation message to a specific Participating Unit (PU), which then responds by transmitting its data, while all other stations receive.  The DNCS then interrogates the next PU in the prescribed roll call.  Link 11 can also operate in a broadcast mode where one participant makes a single data transmission, or a series of single transmissions.  Each Link 11 platform has a Data Terminal Set (DTS) that changes digital computer information into audio tones for transmission by radio.  Link 11 has two waveforms – Conventional Link Eleven Waveform (CLEW) and Single tone Link Eleven Waveform (SLEW).

 

Purpose

Real-time exchange of EW data, and air, surface, and subsurface tracks and points, together with amplifying data.  Transmission of orders, alerts and commands.

Attributes

Simplex (but may be regarded as half-duplex).

Parallel, Netted with single NCS.

Broadcast.

Data Rate 1364 or 2250 bps.

Encryption. KG-40/40A.

Standards

STANAG 5511

MIL-STD-6011B

MIL-STD-188-203-1A

OPSPEC-411

UK DTDL-IRS (Part II) – Link 11

 

Medium

HF or UHF

CLEW.  DTS: AN/USQ-111, MX512P, AN/USQ-125 or AN/USQ-120.

SLEW.  DTS: AN/USQ-125 or AN/USQ-120.

MFL.  DTS: AN/USQ-120.

DNL.

S-TADIL A.  Full implementation of Link 11A using Satellite Communication (SATCOM) in place of HF / UHF (different from Link 11B SATCOM).

Format

‘M’ series messages.


CLEW

Data is transmitted in two 30-bit frames, each consisting of 24 information bits and six error detection and correction bits.  The information message is essentially a 48-bit word.  A frame is transmitted in parallel on 15 multiplexed tones.  Diversity is available as required by identical transmissions or independent side band.  A 16th tone is reserved for Doppler correction.

 

SLEW

Data is transmitted in a message format consisting of an acquisition preamble followed by a header block, a number of data fields, and End-Of-Message (EOM) field.  The preamble resolves Automatic Gain Control (AGC), signal detection, synchronisation, Doppler requirements and equalisation.  The header and data fields use digital procedures for Error Detection And Correction (EDAC) to gain robustness.

CLEW and SLEW are not compatible waveforms.

 

Track No

12 bit Data Link Reference Number (DLRN) (4 digit octal number, indicating the originating unit, not current tracking unit).

DLRNs correlate with, and may be, mapped onto L16 TNs (but must be cross referenced to L1 NATO Track Numbers (NTN).

Strengths

Very widely fitted in NATO and beyond, and will remain operational until at least 2015.

HF ground wave provides BLOS range out to 300nm, but often unreliable beyond 150nm.

Sky-wave capability can provide reliable ranges in excess of 600nm.

SOPs

ADatP-11

ADatP-33

Limitations

The CLEW / SLEW waveforms are incompatible and all PUs must use the same waveform to achieve connectivity.

Nodal nature makes it vulnerable to loss of DNCS.

Lack of ECM-resistance means it can be rendered inoperative in a hostile jamming environment.

Cannot handle ground tracks.


Link 11B (TADIL B)

Link 11B, sometimes called Serial Link 11, is essentially a point-to-point version of Link 11 (TADIL A), but its implementation differs slightly in some areas.  For instance, Link 11B includes a unique message to monitor the status of its link and it does not implement some messages concerned with ASW data.  Link 11B is typically used to disseminate a track picture between ground units in the same way as Link 1, but it is more capable and secure.

 

Purpose

Real-time exchange of EW data, and air, surface, and subsurface tracks and points, together with amplifying data.

Transmission of orders, alerts and commands.  Free text available.

Attributes

Duplex.

Serial.

Point-to-point. Pairs of RUs operate on separate LINK 11B channels often referred to as B links.

Data Rate 600, 1200, 2400, 4800 and 9600bps.

Encryption. (KG-30, KG-84, KG-94A, KG-194A).

Format

‘M’ series messages.

72 bits per message (24 bits overhead and 48 bits of information) arranged in eight 9-bit frames with:

1 start frame;

6 data frames, each with a mark bit;

1 end check frame with a mark bit.

 

Medium

Single or multi-channel radio.

Landline.

Microwave.

SATCOM.

Track No

12 bit DLRN (4 digit octal number).

Standards

STANAG 5511

MIL-STD-6011

MIL-STD-188-212

UK DTDL-IRS (Part II) – Link 11B

SOPs

ADatP-11

ADatP-33

Strengths

ECM-resistant, as is inherent in a buried cable or microwave link.

Limitations

Cannot handle ground tracks.


JTIDS IJMS

Interim JTIDS Message Specification (IJMS) was developed to provide an interim operational capability for JTIDS because the JTIDS hardware was available before the Link 16 message standard.  IJMS is based on Link 11 messages, packaged to fit into the JTIDS architecture.  Consequently, it has the same functionality as Link 11, but with greater security, speed and EPM.  It also provides secure voice communications, but it is not optimised for the JTIDS architecture and so it cannot use the enhanced JTIDS features that increase data throughput.  IJMS usually operates on a network shared with Link 16, for which capacity is allocated by assigning time slots to IJMS participants in the same way as for Link 16 units.  IJMS is still used by NATO but message standards are no longer maintained.

 

Purpose

Exchange of EW data, points, air, surface and subsurface tracks, with amplifying data.  Free text and ECM Resistant Voice (ERV), reduced C2 capability providing digital control and related command and exchange of weapons status information.

 

Attributes

Netted Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) architecture.

Frequency hopping through 51 discrete frequencies.

Spread spectrum.

Encrypted (KGV-8).

Keying Devices KYK-13 or AN/CZY-10.

Data Rate 26,000 bps.

 

Format

‘C,I, N, P, S, T’ series messages.

225 bits per message.

 

Track No

15 bit System Track Number (STN) (5 octal digits).

 

Medium

Upper UHF (960-1215 MHz).

 

Terminals

JTIDS Class 1 – Hughes Improved Terminal (HIT) (also known as ECM Resistant Communication System (ERCS)).  JTIDS Class 2 - bilingual models (some Class 2 terminals only allow JU to synchronise with IJMS).

 

Standards

Now withdrawn or dormant.

 

Strengths

No critical nodes once network is established.  Can be used by Link 16 JUs for time synchronisation.

 

Limitations

JTIDS Class 1 terminals are not capable of operating on Link 16.

Some (but not all) JTIDS Class 2 platforms can operate on IJMS and Link 16 concurrently.

 

SOPs

ADatP-16 contain some IJMS procedures.


MIDS / JTIDS Link 16 (TADIL J)

MIDS describes NATO need for a secure, high capacity, ECM-resistant communications link designed for all environments (space, air, surface and land) and all platform types (including both C2 and non-C2 units).  Based on 1970s technology, the requirement was originally fulfilled by hardware called JTIDS, but newer terminals called MIDS Low Volume Terminal (LVT) also exist.   Utilising time division architecture, Link 16 JUs have pre-assigned sets of multiple time slots in which to transmit their data and to receive data from other units.  The time slots of a net can be parcelled out to one or more Network Participation Group (NPG), which are defined by operational function and by the types of messages that will be transmitted in it.  Link 16 is one of two message standards that may be carried on MIDS / JTIDS, the other being IJMS.

 

Purpose

Exchange of EW data, points, lines, areas, air, space, surface, subsurface and land tracks, with amplifying data, in real-time.

Navigation and identification data, free text, ERV, transmission of orders, alerts, commands and status data.  Digital ac control.

Attributes

Netted TDMA architecture.

Frequency hopping through 51 discrete frequencies.

Spread spectrum.

Encrypted (KGV-8, CDH).

Keying Devices KYK-13 or AN/CZY-10.

Nodeless multi-netting support for up to 127 nets (but practical limit is stated to be 20).

Medium

Upper UHF (960-1215 MHz).

 

Terminals

JTIDS Class 2/2H .

AN/URC-138.

MIDS LVT 1 (standard terminal).

MIDS LVT 2 (US Army version).

MIDS LVT 3 (F15 FDL).

MIDS LVT 4 – 10 (LVT 1 platform variants - see ADatP-33).

Packing

Standard Double Pulse.  Three words, preceded by EPM jitter, time synchronisation and refinement and message header, 500nm propagation available.

Packed 2 Single Pulse.  Six words, with EPM jitter 500nm propagation available.

Packed 2 Double Pulse.  Six words, no EPM jitter 300nm propagation only.

Packed 4 Single Pulse.  Twelve words, no EPM jitter, 300nm propagation only.


Format

‘J’ series messages.

Messages

Made up of one or more of three types of 75-bit words (all starting with 2-bit word format label and ending with 5-bit parity check, the remainder being the fields described below):

Initial Word

5-bit label, 3-bit sub-label, 3-bit message length indicator, 57-bit data.

Extension Word

One to four words, 68-bit data.

Continuation Word

One to 31 words, 5-bit continuation label, 63-bit data.

Strengths

Large and comprehensive message catalogue.

No critical nodes once network is established.

Relay, with up to five dedicated hops, may be designed into the system to achieve BLOS performance, but facility uses data capacity.

Message Packing increases data capacity, but at expense of EPM.

Precise Participant Location & Identification (PPLI) messages provide crypto-secure positive identification.

Two modes of establishing grid position available: Relative grid when relative navigation is provided by measuring Time Of Arrival (TOA) of signals from each terminal; JUs update their geodetic position using data from the position of a terminal acting as

Navigation Controller.  For Geodetic Grid terminals use geodetic position derived from GPS.  TOA data is still calculated but a navigation controller is not active.  GPS is the more accurate and preferred method.

Track No

19 bit STN (Two character alpha numeric – 5-bits each, 0-7 or A-Z, but not I and O – and 3 octal digits, 3-bits each).

Standards

STANAGs 5516 and 4175.

MIL-STD-6016C.

UK DTDL-IRS (Part II) – Link 16.

SOPs

ADatP-16

ADatP-33

Limitations

High capacity requirement constrains link to a UHF solution, range limited to direct LOS (300nm normal mode or 500nm extended).

All participants synchronise on Network Time Reference (NTR) on network entry, but once synchronised, network can operate for only a few hours without NTR.

System shares frequency band of some flight navigation systems (notably DME / TACAN) - permission required from civilian ATC authorities to operate.

MIDS / JTIDS network design is a complex activity and configuration details must be disseminated to all participants before operations can commence.

Clearance to operate MIDS / JTIDS within the UK Flight Information Region (FIR) is administered by the JDLMO Data Link Management Cell (DLMC), UK CAOC, RAF High Wycombe; Monitoring of the UK Frequency Clearance Agreement with the CAA is undertaken by the JDLMO.

MIDS / JTIDS networks operating in the UK are planned, designed and disseminated by the JDLMO Network Design Cell (NDC) using the TDL Network Design System (TNDS).


MIDS / JTIDS Network Participation Groups

NPG‑1            Network Entry

NPG‑2            RTT-A

NPG‑3            RTT-B

NPG‑4            Network Management

NPG‑5            PPLI A

NPG‑6            PPLI B

NPG‑7            Surveillance

NPG‑8            Mission Management / Weapons Coordination

NPG‑9            Control

NPG‑10          Electronic Warfare

NPG‑11          Not used by US platforms

NPG‑12          Voice A

NPG‑13          Voice B

NPG‑14          Reserved joint use (USN Indirect PPLI Interim Use Only)

NPG‑15          Reserved joint use (THAAD Interim Use Only)

NPG‑16          Reserved joint use (THAAD (Interim Use Only)

 

NPG‑17               Not used by US platforms

NPG‑18               Reserved joint use (USN Interim Use Only)

NPG‑19               Fighter-to-Fighter A

NPG‑20               Fighter-to-Fighter B

NPG‑21               Engagement

NPG-22               Composite A

NPG‑23               Composite B

NPG‑24               Not used by US platforms

NPG‑25               Reserved joint use (THAAD Interim Use Only)

NPG‑26               Not used by US platforms

NPG‑27               Joint Net PPLI

NPG‑28               Distributed Network Management

NPG‑29               Residual Messages

NPG‑30               IJMS P Message, Position

NPG‑31               IJMS T Message, Track Report

NPG‑32 to 511    USA Need Lines

NB: An ‘Interim Use Only’ NPG is not approved for joint use.


Qt / Qp Table

 

Time Accuracy

nanoseconds

Quality

Position Accuracy

feet

<50 (NTR)

15

<50

<71

14

<71

<100

13

<100

<141

12

<141

<200

11

<200

<282

10

<282

<400

9

<400

<565

8

<565

<800

7

<800

<1130

6

<1130

<1600

5

<1600

<2260

4

<2260

<4520

3

<4520

<9040

2

<9040

<18080

1

<18080

>18080

0

>18080

 


CPD Table

 

Leap Year CPD Prediction Tables

2008

2004

Month

Day

Month

Day

 

Odd

Even

 

Odd

Even

January

0

1

January

1

0

February

1

0

February

0

1

March

0

1

March

1

0

April

1

0

April

0

1

May

1

0

May

0

1

June

0

1

June

1

0

July

0

1

July

1

0

August

1

0

August

0

1

September

0

1

September

1

0

October

0

1

October

1

0

November

1

0

November

0

1

December

1

0

December

0

1


Non Leap Year CPD Prediction Tables

2006, 2009

2005, 2007, 2010

Month

Day

Month

Day

 

Odd

Even

 

Odd

Even

January

0

1

January

1

0

February

1

0

February

0

1

March

1

0

March

0

1

April

0

1

April

1

0

May

0

1

May

1

0

June

1

0

June

0

1

July

1

0

July

0

1

August

0

1

August

1

0

September

1

0

September

0

1

October

1

0

October

0

1

November

0

1

November

1

0

December

0

1

December

1

0


Link 22

Originally called NATO Improved Link Eleven (NILE) and predominantly designed for maritime forces, Link 22 is planned as a secure, ECM-resistant, medium speed replacement for Link 11 that will work in harmony with Link 16.  It has similar message capabilities to Link 16, but with extended BLOS capability (which is achieved at the expense of data throughput).  Tactical data may be exchanged selectively among NUs within communities of interest, which are defined by functional requirements.  All NUs will be capable of single network operation, but some will be able to communicate on up to four Mission Area Sub Networks (MASN) simultaneously, either using the same or a combination of media.  A set of interconnected networks is known as a Super Network.

 

Purpose

Exchange of EW data, air, space, land, surface & subsurface tracks and points, with amplifying data in real-time.

Transmission of orders, commands and alerts between C2 systems.

 

Attributes

TDMA or dynamic TDMA.

Spread spectrum.

Frequency hopping.

NILE Link Level Crypto (LLC).

Data Rate better than Link 11, but less than Link 16.

 

Format

‘F’ and ‘F/J’ series messages (‘F/J’ messages are ‘J’ messages with 2 additional bits of overhead).

72 bits per message.

 

Track No

19 bit STN (Two character alpha numeric – 5-bits each, 0-7 or A-Z, but not I and O – and 3 octal digits, 3-bits each).

Medium

HF (2 - 30 MHz) and UHF (225 - 400 MHz), simultaneously on different networks using either fixed or frequency agile waveforms.

 

Standards

STANAG 5522

SOPS

ADatP-22

ADatP 33

 

Strengths

Gapless coverage > 300nm range on HF.  Relay may increase geographic coverage of HF > 1000 nm and UHF > 300nm.


VMF

VMF has its origins in a 1970s US Army requirement for a variable message extension to Link 16 and is primarily aimed at ground operations fire support.  Although it will also support many other operations, it is not intended as a surveillance picture compilation link. Sometimes erroneously called Joint VMF, VMF messages are designed as a common means of exchanging digital data between combat units at various organisational levels.  With the flexibility to accommodate varying needs for volume and detail, VMF messages may be applied to a broad range of tactical communication systems.  VMF is bearer-independent, although most current users employ a Combat Net Radio (CNR) compatible system.

 

Purpose

Real-time data exchange for Fire Support, and Close Air Support (CAS). No real-time Situational Awareness (SA) but has Blue Force tracking capability. Many other army based functions.

Attributes

Can be transmitted in either secure or non-secure mode.  Effective throughput varies with medium in use: typically 2,400 bps, 4,800 bps or 9,600 bps using different generation VHF radios, or 16,000 bps using landline.

Format

‘K’ series messages.

VMF is bit-oriented but can use   character-oriented elements. Message lengths may vary.

Medium

Network functions independent of textual portion of message thus VMF is media independent and can operate over any digital point-to-point or network architecture broadcast capable radio system.

 

Messages

Uses predefined fixed length fields and employs a header extension and internal syntax to specify the presence, absence and recurrence of fields, as selected by user.

Header Information

Originator Address Group.

Recipient Address Group.

Information Address Group.

Message Handling Group.

Originator Date/Time/Group.

Perishability Date/Time/Group.

Acknowledgement Request Group.

Response Data Group.

Version Number.

Compression Type.

Message ID Address Group.

Reference Message Group.

Date Time Group Extensions.

User Data

Data Field Indicator.

Data Use Indicator.

Data Item.


Strengths

Achieves higher effective data flow by more efficient use of message space than other types of TDL.

Provides user with flexibility to send specific information only, on demand, and is thus suitable for use in bandwidth constrained environments.

Standards

MIL-STD-6017 (K-series messages).

MIL‑STD‑188‑220 (CNR protocols).

MIL‑STD‑2045‑47001 (Message header).

MIL‑STD‑2045‑14502 Ch1/6.

Reference Documents:

US VMF IOP

Part of the JMTOP. Provides guidance on how VMF systems should be used in the US.

UK VMF Users Guide (VUG)

This UK Unclassified comprehensive guide has been developed for the novice and the systems implementer alike. The guide covers: the communications bearer, messages and their headers, network management, data forwarding and hardware and equipment issues.

UK Single Link Interface Requirement Specification (SLIRS)

SLIRS describes in a user friendly manner, the way that the K-series messages and the MIL-STD-2045-47001 message header are to be implemented by UK platforms. It also describes related issues such as the Tactical Internet interoperability, and network planning and management.